Testing cycle-freeness: Finding a certificate
نویسنده
چکیده
We deal with the problem of designing one-sided error property testers for cycle-freeness in bounded degree graphs. Such a property tester always accepts forests. Furthermore, when it rejects an input, it provides a short cycle as a certificate. The problem of testing cycle-freeness in this model was first considered by Goldreich and Ron [13]. They give a constant time tester with two-sided error (it does not provide certificates for rejection) and prove a Ω( √ n) lower bound for testers with one-sided error. We design a property tester with one-sided error whose running time matches this lower bound (upto polylogarithmic factors). Interestingly, this has connections to a recent conjecture of Benjamini, Schramm, and Shapira [3]. The property of cycle-freeness is closed under the operation of taking minors. This is the first example of such a property that has an almost optimal Õ( √ n)-time one-sided error tester, but has a constant time two-sided error tester. It was conjectured in [3] that this happens for a vast class of minor-closed properties, and this result can seen as the first indication towards that.
منابع مشابه
Finding Cycles and Trees in Sublinear Time
We present sublinear-time (randomized) algorithms for finding simple cycles of length at least k ≥ 3 and tree-minors in bounded-degree graphs. The complexity of these algorithms is related to the distance of the graph from being Ck-minor free (resp., free from having the corresponding tree-minor). In particular, if the graph is Ω(1)-far from being cycle-free (i.e., a constant fraction of the ed...
متن کاملDistributed Property Testing for Subgraph-Freeness Revisited
In the subgraph-freeness problem, we are given a constant-size graph H, and wish to determine whether the network contains H as a subgraph or not. The property-testing relaxation of the problem only requires us to distinguish graphs that are H-free from graphs that are -far from H-free, in the sense that an -fraction of their edges must be removed to obtain an H-free graph. Recently, Censor-Hil...
متن کاملDistributedly Testing Cycle-Freeness
We tackle local distributed testing of graph properties. This framework is well suited to contexts in which data dispersed among the nodes of a network can be collected by some central authority (like in, e.g., sensor networks). In local distributed testing, each node can provide the central authority with just a few information about what it perceives from its neighboring environment, and, bas...
متن کاملTesting odd-cycle-freeness in Boolean functions
Call a function f : F 2 → {0, 1} odd-cycle-free if there are no x1, . . . , xk ∈ Fn2 with k an odd integer such that f(x1) = · · · = f(xk) = 1 and x1 + · · · + xk = 0. We show that one can distinguish odd-cycle-free functions from those ǫ-far from being odd-cycle-free by making poly(1/ǫ) queries to an evaluation oracle. To obtain this result, we use connections between basic Fourier analysis an...
متن کاملDistributed Testing of Excluded Subgraphs
We study property testing in the context of distributed computing, under the classical CONGEST model. It is known that testing whether a graph is triangle-free can be done in a constant number of rounds, where the constant depends on how far the input graph is from being triangle-free. We show that, for every connected 4-node graph H , testing whether a graph is H-free can be done in a constant...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
- CoRR
دوره abs/0906.5010 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2009